Irony in sophocles antigone essay

Ancient Greece The British Museum site is full of interactive tours, simulations, and games to make the study of Ancient Greece enticing for kids. Another option is to take an interactive tour of the Olympics, Greek theatre, and Greek festivals. Other highlights include a God and Goddesses symbol game, an interactive tour of household items, a Spartan education challenge, and a farming challenge.

Irony in sophocles antigone essay

It is as if the Photograph always carries its referent with itself I didn't yet know that this stubbornness of the Referent in always being there would produce the essence I was looking for. And this absence is not a continuous modification of presence, it is a rupture in presence, the 'death' or the possibility of the 'death' of the receiver inscribed in the structure of the mark What holds for the receiver holds also, for the same reasons, for the sender or producer.

However, as evidenced in the above-quoted passages, Barthes's phenomenological reflections on the presence and authenticity of the Referent in photography would seem to be somehow fundamentally in conflict with the arguments advanced by Derrida regarding the structural iterability of writing and the functional necessity of absence within any presence.

Categorizing Literature

The conflict appears in even greater relief if we take into account that "writing" for Derrida is an all-inclusive concept. They are valid not only for all orders of 'signs' and for all languages in general but moreover, beyond semio-linguistic communication, for the entire field of what philosophy would call experience, even the experience of being For Derrida, therefore, photography-and the "totality of experience"--would clearly be governed by the "structure of the mark," the law from which he concludes that "there is no experience consisting of pure presence but only of chains of differential marks" SEC Barthes, while writing in virtually the same historical and intellectual context though not in any kind of direct response to Derridaseems, quite explicitly, to deny the applicability of this logic of the mark to photography: In short, the referent adheres" CL 6.

Nevertheless, I find the refusal of the logic of the mark as Derrida defines it in this passage to be unconvincing: Unlike the performative speech acts analyzed by Derrida, one could perhaps argue that there is not necessarily an intent to communicate something in the photograph, that there is not really an address to an other, at least in a strict or straightforward sense.

Or, one might simply argue that this passage is indicative of the absence of attention to the issue of intentionality in Barthes's analysis a subject which is greatly detailed in Derrida's essay.

For Barthes, we may remember, the photographer, that primary seat of intention, is literally and figuratively 'out of the picture'--his concerns are with the subjects and the readers of photographs. In other words, what I am provisionally suggesting is that, in fact, Barthes does not deny the applicability of the logic of the mark, the law of structural iterability, to photography in this passage, nor in Camera Lucida as a whole.

While, at first glance, a comparative analysis of the arguments of Camera Lucida and "Signature, Event, Context" seems to present one with a substantial philosophical conflict, my project in this paper will be to question the validity of such a conclusion and to determine the ways in which Barthes and Derrida's arguments may be seen to intersect; furthermore, I will examine such questions which arise from consideration of these intersections as, for example: In the course of my analysis, I will also address issues concerning the specificity of Barthes's project in Camera Lucida: These questions, as I will demonstrate, may be elucidated to a certain degree when viewed from the perspective of Lacanian psychoanalytic theory.

The last section of my analysis will then be devoted to a consideration of the object of Barthes's project as, in some sense, specificity "in itself," or "pure" particularity, and I will address the implications of such specificity or "unicity" in terms of the general structure of iterability theorized by Derrida.

Before delving into my suggestion that Camera Lucida as a whole does not deny that the photograph is governed by the logic of the mark, I want first to say a bit more about what I have up until now implicitly posited: There is, I think, an obvious similarity between the objects of analysis of both of these writers--the photographic portraiture which is the privileged focus of Barthes and the signature which Derrida discusses as a kind of privileged limit-example.

While, as mentioned earlier, intentionality in this sense is not an issue that Barthes takes up, the presence of the referent is an important subject for both writers.

In fact, one could easily substitute "photograph" for "signature" in the following passage from Derrida: By definition, a written signature [photograph] implies the actual or empirical non-presence of the signer. But, it will be claimed, the signature also marks and retains his having-been present in a past now or present [maintenant] which will remain a future now or present [maintenant], thus in a general maintenant, in the transcendental form of presentness [maintenance] In order for the tethering to the source to occur, what must be retained is the absolute singularity of a signature-event [photographic-event] and a signature-form [photographic-form]:The Three Theban Plays - Oedipus the King - Oedipus at Colonus – Antigone by Sophocles Translation by F.

Storr To Laius, King of Thebes, an oracle foretold that the child born to him by his queen Jocasta would slay his father and wed his mother. Dramatic Irony in Oedipus Rex by Sophocles - In his work of Oedipus Rex, Greek poet Sophocles had succeeded in weaving dramatic irony into the storyline applicable to multiple situations.

Dramatic irony occurs when a character in the play speaks in a manner that indicates he or she is unaware of other circumstances of which the audience is aware. In Scene 3 of Sophocles's Antigone.

Course Summary This ''Antigone'' Study Guide is a simple way to master comprehension of the play ''Antigone'' so you can succeed on an upcoming exam or class discussion.

Irony in sophocles antigone essay

Enjoying "Oedipus the King", by Sophocles Ed Friedlander MD [email protected] This website collects no information. If you e-mail me, neither your e-mail address nor any other information will ever be passed on to any third party, unless required by law.

Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing, 13th Edition. This title is currently unavailable on myPearsonStore.

Irony in sophocles antigone essay

We recommend Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing, MLA Update Edition, 13th Edition as a replacement.

Poetry, Prose, Drama, Non-Fiction, and Media: The Five Main Types of Literature